Thursday, December 27, 2007
So there was some chatter over on ST on periodization. I generally don't post very often on forums - this case reminded me of why... Nevertheless I posted about the term "reverse-periodization" being a mis-nomer, and generally its usage is a pet-peeve of mine. The thread then took a turn for the worse and generally wasn't too productive from that point on.
Paulo has a nice post over on the triathlon book on his thoughts on the whole reverse periodization trend. Rather than replying to the thread on ST in more detail or writing about the topic here, I'll just send you over to his post.
at 9:15 PM